70 years ago NATO was born in the aftermath of WWII out of a desire to prevent WWIII.
Conceived out of necessity, this enduring alliance was initially forged to prevent Soviet expansionism. The shared democratic values of its members formed a unique bond. An alliance meant to provide reliability in an unreliable world.
For 70 years Europeans have known that America’s foreign policy and priorities would be consistent with theirs.
DonaldTrump’s flip flops and broadsides against NATO have rattled this long and formidable military alliance that largely defined the global post-war order. His veiled threats to pull out plays right into Putin’s hands.
From its Cold War inception, Russia has bristled at the formation of NATO, wanting nothing less than a dissolution of the organization. The North Atlantic Treaty was at heart a military alliance intended as a defense against the Russians.
It is likely Trump has never bothered to understand why the partnership was formed in the first place.
All roads lead to Russia.
The Hungry Bear
The fear of Soviet aggression and the spread of communism defined the post-WWII world.
Cast as the Evil Empire during the cold war, an expansionist Russia was viewed as a “hungry bear” whose insatiable appetite needed to be controlled. The media was flooded with maps depicting the Soviet Unions aggressive tendencies appearing ominously, splotched in red, depicting the global pattern of the spread of the Red offensive
Convinced that comrades in the Kremlin were busy spinning a web of control, hell-bent on forcibly enslaving free people everywhere, the U.S. and her western European allies needed to contain the cunning Russian bear.
Or a cold war could turn very hot.
The big chill almost made us forget that only a few years earlier this big brutal Russian bear had been our warm and fuzzy teddy bear of a wartime ally
During WWII, no one could hold a candle to those brave Stalingrad sacrificing red white and blue Russians. Led by twinkly-eyed pipe smoking “Uncle Joe Stalin they were our comrades in fighting the Nazis.
Songwriters cheered and praised our Soviet comrades as we whistled “You Can’t Brush Off a Russian” and “Stalin Wasn’t Stall’in.” Selling the Soviets to us like a bottle of Pepsi, one ditty went:
“The Soviet Union hits the spot
12 million soldiers that’s a lot
Timashen and Stalin too
The Soviet Union is Red white and blue.”
The Big Chill
As the war came to a close the Soviets and Americans converged in Berlin, toasting each other at their shared victory.
The guns fell silent in Europe in May 1945 but the post-WWII world would have very little peace. A hot war might have ended with those 2 fiery Atomic Blasts in Japan but another war a cold one began with our former allies in arms, the Russians.
By 1946 the world was changing at a dizzying pace.
Maps had been redrawn, swelling and shrinking the areas of countries creating new boundaries, as cards were re-shuffled and friendships dissolved. Like so many war born marriages, it turned out our grand alliance with the Soviets was more a marriage of convenience. Uncle Joe, our warm and fuzzy teddy bear quickly turned into a cold-blooded grizzly bear ready to gobble up crippled Europe turning its starving shivering population into godless Communists. As Soviet tanks angrily roamed Eastern European streets, Churchill warned of an Iron Curtain descending over Europe.
Our war born goodwill faded as quickly as Elizabeth Arden’s vanishing cream.
Better Dead Than Red
Convinced the Russians had embarked on an aggressive campaign to destroy our government, establishing the American Way of Life as ideal became even more crucial during this time contrasting it to the “Ruthless, Godless Communist” way of repression. We were to be on alert to the menace of Communism.
As the cold war was heating up a series of events in the late 1940’s pointed to the fact that the security of Western Europe was tied to the security of the U.S. The threat of Soviet invasion of Western Europe pushing further into the freedom-loving democracies hung over the continent.
As if shifting gears between enemy and ally was as effortless as the automatic transmission in your Chevrolet the considerable fury and fear that had fueled our hatred of those bloodless Nazis had been and swiftly rerouted to those Godless Russian commies.
Germany, in fact, was a constant cause of concern.
After the war, Germany had been carved up into 4 occupied zones between the Allied victors of WWII. Berlin itself was divided up into Communist East Berlin and democratic West Berlin. But Berlin was stuck deep inside the Soviet-occupied parts of East Germany. West Berlin was a thriving, cosmopolitan city. In Soviet East Berlin the destruction of the war was still visible, the people far from prosperous, with luxury items scarce. Every year tens of thousands of East Berliners fled to capitalist West Germany.
The fear was that the Soviets wanted Germany to be the communist centerpiece of Europe. With Germany a Soviet satellite, Stalin licked his chops with the thought of Western Europe falling under the domination of the USSR. In June 1948 the Soviets imposed a blockade of Berlin in hopes of starving the Western Allies out of Berlin.
The same year the Soviets launched a coup in Czechoslovakia overthrowing a democratic government. They had already placed a communist government in power in Poland and extended its sway to every Eastern European country it occupied since 1945.
Adding fuel to the fire, America’s nuclear monopoly came to an abrupt end in 1949.
We were just digesting the Communist take over of China when on a hot summer morning in August the Soviets detonated an Atom Bomb sending a shock wave around the world. Many feared an impending war with Russia. As long as the aggression existed in the form of the Evil Empire and “their unrelenting drive to enslave humanity” the threat of an unwanted nuclear war would cast a long shadow.
The clear Soviet provocations created the urgency for the collective defense of Western Europe.
This was the grave backdrop as talks proceeded on a North Atlantic Treaty.
Europe was still clawing its way out of the destruction of the war and to be credible, any collective defense had to include the U.S. and Canada. After the war much of the world was economically shattered, returning home to cities that were often just rubble of broken bricks and smoldering wood, the desolate shell of a former city not yet done burning.
In our country, our economy was booming and there wasn’t a single building demolished by bombs, a brick displaced, or window broken and the only geographical scar was the one we ourselves had made on the empty deserts of New Mexico.
America had come out of the war as the only major industrial power not severely damaged, the richest country on earth.
European leaders met with U.S. defense, military and diplomates at the Pentagon exploring a framework for a new and unprecedented alliance.
All members agreed to defend one another – that is still the core of the alliance. It was a security pact stating that a military attack against one would be considered an attack against them all. NATO was both a military alliance and also ideological. These were all liberal democracies and the will to push back against totalitarianism and Communism ran deep.
The North Atlantic Treaty, signed by twelve nations on a Monday afternoon in April of 1949 in Washington D.C., saw the United States accept the lead in the free world’s postwar resistance to Communist aggression and subversion.
We accepted our banner as leaders of the Free World with pride and purpose and commitment
Today NATO is the strongest, most successful alliance in history
But it has never been just a purely military alliance. There is a special emotional bond between America and the European allies. It is a political alliance as well based on the common aspirations of its members of freedom and peace. As the NATO treaty states its members are determined to safeguard individual freedom and rule of law. These values are far from obsolete
But these principles are under assault today. Russian aggression in Eastern Europe, Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea, the terrorism of the Islamic State spreading from the Middle East to the capitals of Europe, authoritarian regimes developing nuclear weapons — as different as these challenges are, they have one thread in common: They come from those who oppose the international order. They try to undermine or even change the rules that have governed the age of democracy and prosperity since World War II.
The democracies of NATO need to stand together to overcome these challenges.
Copyright (©) 2019 Sally Edelstein All Rights Reserved
Just wonderful article, great graphics! 💜
Sent from my iPhone
LikeLiked by 2 people
Glad you enjoyed it Beth.
An excellent look at why NATO was – and is – important to our security!
LikeLiked by 1 person
The USSR version and adversary of NATO, the Warsaw Pact, was dissolved in 1991 after the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The Warsaw Pact members voted their own leaders into office and the Berlin Wall fell letting Germany reunite. Russia began holding elections for President and the Duma (parliament) with elected Senators. In 2002 President Putin put forward a request to join NATO. Up to the second term of Obama the US, not NATO members, refused to let Russia join. Today NATO has no purpose other than selling more weapons to it’s membership. The nearly $1 trillion spent by NATO would be better used by the United Nations for humanitarian aid and cleaning up the planet’s pollution. The people of Russia are not our enemy. Terrorism is the enemy set to destroy us 1 at a time or 3000 in a few hours.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the early 1950s, the Soviet Union had suggested it should join NATO to preserve peace in Europe but the NATO countries fearful that the Soviet Union’s motive was to weaken the alliance ultimately rejected this.
One of its immediate results was the creation of the Warsaw Pact, signed on May 14, 1955, by the Soviet Union, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania, and East Germany as a formal response to this event, thereby delineating the two opposing sides of the Cold War.
Our issue has never been with the Russian people but with its leadership. And yes you are correct in pointing out that terrorism is our number one adversary
Are you suggesting it is up to US-led NATO to decide the appropriate person to lead a country? The invasion of Afghanistan by NATO in late 2001 and we are still there today. Who gave NATO the right to invade and destroy both Libya and Syria? I remember President Kennedy, after only a few meetings with Nikita Khrushchev, we finally had a nuclear test ban treaty. Other treaties were signed reducing the number of nuclear weapons. Now the US has withdrawn from the INF while Russia awaits new talks. Let the people decide with open conversions whether planet Earth will exist in 100 years.
No, I am not suggesting that at all.